|
 | |  |  |
 |
| | | |
|
| | | Nursing 2010 | | | | | Sale Price | : $21.99 | | Cover Price | : $59.88 | | Savings | : 63% | | Issues | : 12 | | Availability | : In Stock |
| Average Customer Rating |
|
|
|
|  | |
Nursing 2010 magazine is the ultimate source for clinical and professional information, the latest news, equipment updates, and more.
| |
Package Deals
Nursing 2010 can also be purchased in the following package deals.
Customer Reviews
Submitted By: Edgar Huff
Part Two:
In an April letter to the hospital?s human resources department, Huff?s attorney, Jacksonville lawyer Ernie Wright said Huff was the subject of race and gender discrimination under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
?My client believes his bogus prosecution and subsequent harassment were racially motivated,? Wright stated. ?As such, he fears coming back to work at Duplin General Hospital and will be seeking unlimited compensatory and punitive damages.?
Huff said he cannot find work in the profession he has trained for his entire adult life.
?Nobody wants to give me a chance,? he said. ?I did not do anything wrong. I was found not guilty in a judicial court of law, but I can?t get a job.?
Contact Lindell Kay at 910-219-8456. Read his blog here.
straightgate wrote: and is Edgar Huff
More to the story is right. The hospital would not allow his Charge Nurse, the Senior Psych Tech, nor the BSN to give a statement during the investigation on Mr. Huff for the night in question even though they were together all night. Mr. Huff told investigator to check films from the cameras on the Psych Unit to prove his innocence. Three days later they told Mr. Huff the cameras did not record. Days later Mr. Huff agreed to take a polygraph and if it returned fine he could return to work without a problem. Mr. Huff called after hospital never called him back. Hospital Investigator told Mr. Huff he would not be allowed to take the polygragh because the woman that accused him refused to take one and if he wanted to clear himself he would have to prove it in court. After being found not guilty, the EEOC was contacted to investigate, then EEOC sent case to their Enforcement Dept. after their finding they recomended a mediation but DGH refused. EEOC at that point sent the writ to sue !
Submitted By: Edgar Huff
Comments: Edgar Huff, Jr.
show details 11:22 AM (0 minutes ago)
Hubert man sues hospital
Comments 31 | Recommended6
January 17, 2010 12:48 AM
LINDELL KAY
A Hubert man who claims to have been wrongfully terminated after a patient said he sexually assaulted her is suing Duplin General Hospital for $10 million.
?I was discriminated against because I was a black male nurse,? Edgar Huff told The Daily News on Friday.
In a lawsuit filed last month in Onslow County Superior Court, Huff claims a patient erroneously accused him of inappropriately touching her breasts in November 2008 and the hospital fired him without a proper investigation.
The Duplin County Sheriff?s Department charged Huff with sexual battery in December 2008.
Huff said he was locked up and had to sell his dead father?s watch, a family heirloom, to pay $300 to a bail bondsman to get out of jail.
He was found not guilty of the misdemeanor criminal charge by a N.C. District Court judge in February.
The lawsuit claims the hospital maliciously prosecuted Huff, abused the justice process leading to Huff?s false imprisonment and defamed Huff, preventing him from finding gainful employment.
?I had to go through three long months suffering mental anguish, loss of dignity and low self-esteem,? he said. ?I had to worry night and day about the possibility of being put on the sex offenders list for 10 years, giving my DNA, fearing losing my nurses license and worrying that I may be incarcerated for years for something I did not do.?
The lawsuit also claims the hospital was slow in paying Huff accrued vacation and holiday pay.
Detailed messages left by The Daily News with hospital officials were not returned.
The N.C. Employment Security Commission ruled that Huff ?was discharged but not for misconduct or substantial fault connected with work.?
In July, the N.C. Board of Nursing ruled that there was no ?clear and convincing? evidence Huff had violated any standards of the Nursing Practice Act.
In a
Submitted By: christina jones RN
I love Nursing 2010 and have been receiving it annually since the early 90's. The articles are always concise and full of information and I find myself learning new nursing techniques with each magazine I read. In the August 4-7 edition I DID notice an error and wanted to let you know about it. Keep putting out such a wonderful addition to any nurses's education! I look forward to each issue, and I will continue to renew my subscription to this magazine each and every year.
| |  | |  |
|
